Re: Why the moon landing was a hoax - no jumps!

Jim Wilkins wrote:

> "Tyrone"  wrote in message 
> news:[email protected]...

> On Jun 3, 2024 at 2:04:59 AM EDT, "bertietaylor" <bertietaylor> wrote:

>> I don't assume that. I prove that. Why no jumps? Why no stars? Why
>> flags
>> fluttering? Why deep footprints? Why chaps leaning forward! Why C rock?
>> How the great photos? Who took the famous photo with the other one
>> clearly not taking it as its showed on the visor? Etc. etc.

> OMG. That's it?  That's your "proof"?  They are all incredibly stupid.
> I'll
> pick one at random.

Why only one?

> Why would you expect to see stars in the pictures? You need long
> exposure
> photos IN THE DARK to see stars, because stars are VERY DIM. 

Hardly.  They are very bright on the Moon, enough to be picked up by any
camera.
Arindam recently photographed the full Moon on Norfolk Island. It is up
on his facebook page.
It shows stars around the Moon and even through the thin clouds.
No pollution there, so such a photo taken with a commercial smartphone.
Would be better on the Moon with no atmosphere at all.




There are
> no
> stars in the Lunar pictures because they are in full daylight.  They
> are
> taking pictures of nearby people and objects that are very brightly
> lit.

Again, this shows the sheeple mentality.  Daylight on the Moon is
nothing like daylight on Earth. 

The Sun on the Moon is just a bright object.  It does not scatter its
rays as it does on Earth, with the atmosphere. The rays fall directly
from a point. Like a searchlight in the dark, which of course was the
situation when it was all filmed on Earth. Certainly the stars would
have been seen had they been filming on the Moon. The sunlight on the
Moon would not have blocked the starlight. 

All astronauts orbiting the Earth see the stars very clearly with the
Sun full on. No reason why things should be different on the Moon.

> That
> the sky is black has nothing to do with anything.

It shows that the filming was done on Earth under a spotlight and with
special exposures on the cameras to block out the stars.

> Here is your test. Go outside on a clear night, when there are stars.
> You 
> and
> a friend stand under a street light. You take a normal picture of your 
> friend,
> lit from above by the street light. If there are no street lights and
> it
> is
> dark, then use the camera flash. Then tell us how many stars you see in
> the
> background.

Let us go to the Moon and try things out. 
The high quality photos, perfect shots, could only have been got on
Earth by top photographers.

BertieTaylor

> The answer - of course - is that you will see none.  Closeups of
> brightly 
> lit
> objects will mean a very short exposure. This will be way too short to
> show
> stars in the sky.

> --------------------------------
> The camera that took the questioned photo was mounted on the chest of
> the 
> suit, where his hands are clearly placed to operate it.
> The "evidence" is false.

> The C isn't on the original negative.
> https://www.iop.org/explore-physics/moon/how-do-we-know-we-went-to-the-moon
> The "evidence" is false.

> The flag wasn't fluttering, it was wrinkled from storage.
> The "evidence" is false.

> They did jump quite a bit higher on the Moon than they could on Earth
> in
> a 
> suit that doubled their weight. Pick up someone your size and see how
> high 
> you can jump, the only fair comparison.
> The "evidence" is false.