Re: Why the moon landing was a hoax - no jumps!

Jim Wilkins wrote:

> "Tyrone"  wrote in message 
> news:[email protected]...

> On Jun 3, 2024 at 2:04:59 AM EDT, "bertietaylor" <bertietaylor> wrote:

>> I don't assume that. I prove that. Why no jumps? Why no stars? Why
>> flags
>> fluttering? Why deep footprints? Why chaps leaning forward! Why C rock?
>> How the great photos? Who took the famous photo with the other one
>> clearly not taking it as its showed on the visor? Etc. etc.

> OMG. That's it?  That's your "proof"?  They are all incredibly stupid.
> I'll
> pick one at random.

> Why would you expect to see stars in the pictures? You need long
> exposure
> photos IN THE DARK to see stars, because stars are VERY DIM. There are
> no
> stars in the Lunar pictures because they are in full daylight.  They
> are
> taking pictures of nearby people and objects that are very brightly
> lit.
> 
> That
> the sky is black has nothing to do with anything.

> Here is your test. Go outside on a clear night, when there are stars.
> You 
> and
> a friend stand under a street light. You take a normal picture of your 
> friend,
> lit from above by the street light. If there are no street lights and
> it
> is
> dark, then use the camera flash. Then tell us how many stars you see in
> the
> background.

> The answer - of course - is that you will see none.  Closeups of
> brightly 
> lit
> objects will mean a very short exposure. This will be way too short to
> show
> stars in the sky.

> --------------------------------
> The camera that took the questioned photo was mounted on the chest of
> the 
> suit, where his hands are clearly placed to operate it.
> The "evidence" is false.

So how did he manage to take his face photo if the camera was on his
chest?
Managing any camera in such a suit with such gloves is some feat in any
case.
Getting top photos... in such a situation, on a first time basis, is
miraculous.

> The C isn't on the original negative.
> https://www.iop.org/explore-physics/moon/how-do-we-know-we-went-to-the-moon
> The "evidence" is false.

It is said that all the negatives have been destroyed mysteriously.
Well, we have to look at what we have got, and what we see is a prop
Hollywood style.  Probably left there by a whistle-blower.

> The flag wasn't fluttering, it was wrinkled from storage.
> The "evidence" is false.

It did not look like it was wrinkled from storage. Flags are not
crunched up, they are rolled up. It was fluttering as exactly it would
flutter in a breeze on Mother Earth. Your explanation is worse than the
usual one, which is that the springy action on the supporting pole was
causing it to flutter. Which also is not satisfactory, for it is
fluttering exactly as it would flutter in a breeze.

> They did jump quite a bit higher on the Moon than they could on Earth
> in
> a 
> suit that doubled their weight. 

Don't confuse mass with weight. Their mass with suit would be say 150Kg
which means that they would weigh 25 Kg on the Moon. No one says that
their muscle power decreased by 6 times, so they could jump up 6 times
more than on Earth. Also, they would feel that they only weighed 25 Kg,
very light that is, so they would feel full of strength and vitality.
They could not help jumping up at least 1-3 feet with each step, and
falling down slowly.  A wonderful experience that would have been, had
they really been there.




> Pick up someone your size and see how
> high 
> you can jump, the only fair comparison.

Again, let us do fat farming on the Moon. Get the billionaires there, to
reduce their weight. Best way is to fund Arindam for his ftl motors. He
can do it in 5-10 years, with adequate resourcing. We are afraid that
the unscientific or political attitudes are in opposition to new and
wonderful technologies following from Arindam's new updated Newtonian
physics. But the reactionaries can delay for only so long.




> The "evidence" is false.

Yes, all evidence of the so-called moon landing is false. Men never
landed there, but they may have dropped probes and other stuff, and even
gone around the Moon. Anyway, nothing from NASA need be believed. Their
heads are stuck in black holes!


A good fraction of the US population hold that the moon landings were
faked. Aldrin even had to beat up someone who told him so.

BertieTaylor