Re: Why the moon landing was a hoax - no jumps!
Whisper <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy,alt.fan.heinlein,rec.aviation.military |
|---|---|
| Organization | Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/06/2024 1:16 pm, Tyrone wrote: > On Jun 5, 2024 at 10:46:30 PM EDT, "bertietaylor" <bertietaylor> wrote: > >> Tyrone wrote: >> >>> On Jun 5, 2024 at 8:09:37 PM EDT, "bertietaylor" <bertietaylor> wrote: >> >>>> Tyrone wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Jun 4, 2024 at 9:07:21 PM EDT, "bertietaylor" <bertietaylor> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Flags don't flutter, they oscillate from the manipulation. After some >>>>>>> time undisturbed, they no longer flutter. >>>>>> >>>>>> We all can see how the US flag is fluttering in the photo. The lateral >>>>>> wavings can only be caused by breeze. >>>> >>>>> You can see the flag fluttering in a still photo? How is that >>>>> possible? >>>> >>>> The lateral movements. Impossible in a still.atmosphere. could have >>>> worked on Earth with an evacuated dome but that would have been too >>>> expensive. >> >>> You see lateral movements in a still photo? AGAIN, how is that >>> possible? >> >> One xan see a flag waving in the wind and take a photo. Then of that >> flag with no wind. The difference between the two states will be >> obvious. One can say there was wind in obe case and not the other. > > AGAIN, there is no movement in a still photo. I can crunch up a piece of > paper and take a picture of it. Is it "fluttering in the breeze"? > > It is absolutely amazing to me that you think a still photo is moving. What > kind of drugs are you taking? No drugs, this is natural iq