Re: Why the moon landing was a hoax - no jumps!
bertietaylor @novabbs.com.invalid (bertietaylor)
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy,alt.fan.heinlein,rec.aviation.military |
|---|---|
| Organization | novaBBS |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tyrone wrote: > On Jun 5, 2024 at 10:46:30 PM EDT, "bertietaylor" <bertietaylor> wrote: >> Tyrone wrote: >> >>> On Jun 5, 2024 at 8:09:37 PM EDT, "bertietaylor" <bertietaylor> wrote: >> >>>> Tyrone wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Jun 4, 2024 at 9:07:21 PM EDT, "bertietaylor" <bertietaylor> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Flags don't flutter, they oscillate from the manipulation. After some >>>>>>> time undisturbed, they no longer flutter. >>>>>> >>>>>> We all can see how the US flag is fluttering in the photo. The lateral >>>>>> wavings can only be caused by breeze. >>>> >>>>> You can see the flag fluttering in a still photo? How is that >>>>> possible? >>>> >>>> The lateral movements. Impossible in a still.atmosphere. could have >>>> worked on Earth with an evacuated dome but that would have been too >>>> expensive. >> >>> You see lateral movements in a still photo? AGAIN, how is that >>> possible? >> >> One xan see a flag waving in the wind and take a photo. Then of that >> flag with no wind. The difference between the two states will be >> obvious. One can say there was wind in obe case and not the other. > AGAIN, there is no movement in a still photo. I can crunch up a piece > of > paper and take a picture of it. Is it "fluttering in the breeze"? Was the US flag made of paper? Crunched up, placed on a stick? Is that how it is done in the US? > It is absolutely amazing to me that you think a still photo is moving. I am not amazed at all by what you write, I assure all those who may be interested. > What > kind of drugs are you taking? None. bt