Re: Why the moon landing was a hoax - no jumps!
bertietaylor @novabbs.com.invalid (bertietaylor)
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy,alt.fan.heinlein,rec.aviation.military |
|---|---|
| Organization | novaBBS |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kualinar wrote: > Le 2024-06-06 à 10:36, Richard Harnden a écrit : >> On 06/06/2024 13:36, Kualinar wrote: >>> Le 2024-06-04 à 21:07, bertietaylor a écrit : >>>> Kualinar wrote: >>>> >>>>> Le 2024-06-03 à 02:04, bertietaylor a écrit : >> >>>> >>>>> Stars are way to dim compared to the ground. >>>> >>>> Rubbish. On the Moon they would be very bright as in near space orbit >>>> away from the atmosphere >> >> . >>> Seen from space, the stars are barely brighter than seen from the >>> surface of the Earth. The main difference is that they don't twinkle >>> as their light is not disturbed by the atmospheric turbulence. >>> So, NO, the stars seen from space are NOT very bright. >> >> The magnitude on the Moon is about -13, the Sun -27. >> Jupiter is -2, Mars about the same. >> Sirius is -1.5, Betelgeuse and Aldebaran about +1. >> Limit to what you can see is around +6. >> >> The suface of the Moon is way too bright to be able to see any stars if >> >> you're stood to it. >> >> >> >> >> > Surface of the moon : magnitude -13, brightest star in the sky, Sirius > magnitude -1.5. > That's an 11.5 magnitude difference. +1 in magnitude = 10 times dimer. > That make Sirius about 30 000 000 000 times dimer than the surface of > the Moon. > Those space and Moon landing deniers refuse to understand that. Their > expectation are unrealistic, and when reality don't meet their > expectations, they scream FAKE !!! No worries mate, space tourism with Arindam's reactionless internal force drives will take all who can pay around the Moon. Then all will see what was what. Bertietaylor