Re: Why the moon landing was a hoax - no jumps!

Jim Wilkins wrote:

> "Kualinar"  wrote in message news:[email protected]...

> With bertietaylor, it's worst than arguing with children. At least,
> children CAN understand, are WILLING, even eager, to learn.
> As for bertietaylor... He actively refuse to understand and actively
> refuse to learn anything that don't support his stupid conclusion.

Unfortunately blind repetition of established lies do not convince the
intelligent. 

> -------------------------------

> Many years ago two neo-nazis argued on rec.aviation.military that
> Germany 
> could have won if a few things had gone differently. Several of us
> fairly 
> politely countered and destroyed all of their arguments. At least they
> could 
> accept being proven wrong in each instance, and brought up the next
> claim. 
> These deniers are worse than the nazis.

Hitler should have taken Gibraltar and not invaded USSR until he was
much stronger. Had he done the one and not the other we would have been
talking German today. Blocking the Med.and a strong defence instead of
attack on the Eastern front would have kept the Nazis going.

> For example, despite all the hype they provoked, the V1 and V2 missiles
> 
> delivered about the same total weight of explosive during the whole of
> the 
> war as the RAF plus US bombers could in one night and day. 

Desperate stuff.

bt