Re: [GD-DEVEL] Call for test: 2.0.36

[email protected] ("Pierre Joye") Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:00:02 +0100
Newsgroups php.gd.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Ethan,

Thanks for testing!

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Ethan A Merritt
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sunday 09 March 2008 16:53, Pierre Joye wrote:
>  > Hi!
>  >
>  > Before I release 2.0.36 officially, I would like to get some feedbacks
>  > first. If everything runs smoothly and on your various platforms :)
>  > >
>  > The packages are available here:
>  >
>  > http://pierre.libgd.org/qa/gd-2.0.36.tar.gz
>  > http://pierre.libgd.org/qa/gd-2.0.36.tar.bz2
>  >
>  > Please let me know if you met any issue or if everything works as expected.
>
>  I was about to test it, but ran into a glitch:
>
>  It is a little annoying that it fails if one doesn't have the latest version
>  of autotools.  My Mandriva 2007.1 systems from only 6 months ago stll have
>  version 2.59, and I suspect it will be another year or so before one
>  can count on having 2.61 as a majority of linux machines.
>
>  ./configure runs normally, but then
>
>  [11] make
>  cd . && /bin/sh /usr/local/src/gd-2.0.36/config/missing --run autoheader
>  aclocal.m4:17: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61.
>  You have another version of autoconf.  If you want to use that,
>  you should regenerate the build system entirely.
>  aclocal.m4:17: the top level
>  autom4te-2.5x: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63
>  autoheader-2.5x: /usr/bin/autom4te failed with exit status: 63
>  make: *** [config.hin] Error 1
>
>  [12] autoconf --version
>  autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59
>
>  Wouldn't it be better to build the distro tarball on a machine with
>  autotools 2.59, so that it is usable on a larger number of configurations?

It should  or could yes. I build the package on my ubuntu (last
stable) but it is definitively too new.

I have to find a host with 2.59, Etch also has 2.61. It sounds like I
will have to either install it in my ~ or use a vm with a sarge
install. Autoconf 2.59 is four years old. I suspect Mandriva to have
kept it for PHP (PHP was requiring this version).

-- 
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org