Re: [GD-DEVEL] GD build process

[email protected] (Chris Reuter) writes:

> [email protected] (Pierre Joye) writes:

>>> Actually, I'll look into that.  I'd like to get rid of gd.h.in in favor
>>> of moving the generated stuff to a small corner of the program.
>>> (Basically, provide functions that return the version info and turn the
>>> #defines into calls to them.  This means the version will be correct in
>>> programs using GD when the libgd shared library is updated.  It also
>>> reduces the complexity of the build process and makes the code a little
>>> easier to hack on.)
>>
>> Makes sense :) Don't we have one already in 2.1?
>
> I've got it mostly done now.  I'll send you a pull request once I've got
> it cleaned up, since it expands the API a bit and you might want to
> review it.

It's done, pull request #17.  Feel free to contact me if you have any
questions or concerns or just want me to explain my thinking.


                              --Chris


-- 
Chris Reuter                                                 http://www.blit.ca
"A journalism that strives for the social respectability of, say, the legal
 profession (stop laughing there, at the back!) is almost certainly one that
 isn't doing its job."  --Andrew Orlowski, _The Register_