Re: pt_BR should be 'connected up' in an hour or so

Steph Fox escreveu:
> ....I hope!

Now it is !

> putting your patches into CVS in a non-public way - but there were tabs 
> in a lot of those files. You need to make sure you can physically see 
> the difference between tabs and spaces in your editor; there should 
> never be a tab in an XML file, full stop. The other thing was line 
> length, but everybody's equally bad at that, including me. We're 
> supposed to hard-wrap at 78 characters. There _is_ a reason for this - 
> some people have editors that wrap lines at 80 chars, and of course if 
> we have long lines in the source it's messed up for them when they need 
> to work on it. So basically shorter's better than longer.
> 

Is important for us do not always comply with this wrap :( , but if this 
really important I will do.
I will show why. Each file in doc is for a class, some of them are big, 
more than 1000 lines(some more than 2000). Is important for me that a 
translated file have the exact number of lines as the file in en. I 
translate a file. Later someone from en changes a line, by example the 
line 1850. If we have the same number of lines in pt_BR as en, this same 
line will be 1850 in portuguese. Easy to find and update. But if we 
always wrap at 80, the text in portuguese always will be bigger, so in 
this case, we will have to seach where the line 1850 from en is on pt_BR.

> Apart from that, as far as I can tell all's kosher :)  Thanks!
> 
> Fernando next - all looks fine (apart from the line length thing 
> naturally) but could you please take a quick look at the OO tutorial? I 
> don't read pt_BR but I came away with the impression that that 
> particular tutorial had a few typos in it.  e.g. I saw a 'p' floating 
> around somewhere I'm fairly sure there should've been an 'o', that kind 
> of thing. And thanks to you to, of course! - not least because I didn't 
> find anything more from Diego waiting on the pile.

I will look for this typos. I commited all files for Diego.

> 
> You'll be glad to hear that the pt_BR docs finally built last night, but 
> the bad news is that that was the weekly catch-all run. We can't tell 
> whether it's responding to daily updates now or not, but it wasn't doing 
> so two days ago. Andrei's aware and is keeping an eye on the situation 
> there.

Really I do not know why this, because I always build the manual before 
each commit, sometimes it does not build for me, but I fix before 
commit. And if there is an error, why the weekly build works and the 
night do not? I do not know.