Re: [PHP-GTK] PHP-GTK Standalone Kit
[email protected] (Elizabeth Smith)
| Newsgroups | php.gtk.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Whether it is the "best" is an exercise left up to the individual developer. > Having a single software platform to share data with client and server has > proven to me invaluable. That my servers run PHP and share data with my > client software makes PHP-GTK a no-brainer. Err, you're missing the point here. Windows + gtk and dependency dll hell + a million php installs is not a good combination. Every php-gtk script installing their own version of php-gtk will add up (especially with many small scripts) and doesn't gain you a thing. A single common way to install php-gtk (on windows or even unified locations/settings on *nix) is an excellent thing. I can tell you right now that gnope breaks any php installed using the "official" php msi installer. Do we really need a dozen installers overwriting each other and putting conflicting ini files in bad places? > And the 10 or so MBs for the installer has *NEVER* shown up on the RADAR as in > any way problematic. (For MacOSX, the installer effectively swallows some 400 > MB with X11, XCode, and the PHP-GTK binaries, and even that is deemed worth > it by my clientelle) The issue isn't "is php-gtk worth it" it's "do we need yet another [windows] installer that does things its own way" > I guess the real question to answer is introspective - is your program > actually worth $0.01 to your end users? > > -Ben >