RE: [INTERNALS-WIN] PHP7: which Windows Kit?

[email protected] ("Anatol Belski") Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:42:39 +0200
Newsgroups php.internals.win
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Jan,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Ehrhardt [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 11:35 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [INTERNALS-WIN] PHP7: which Windows Kit?
> 
> "Anatol Belski" in php.internals.win (Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:39:08 +0200):
> >Well, I have one netbook with win7 x86 + vc14 ... will probably brush
> >out soon ...
> >
> >C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\VC\INCLUDE;C:\Program
> >Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\VC\ATLMFC\INCLUDE;C:\Program
> >Files\Windows Kits\10\include\10.0.10150.0\ucrt;C:\Program
> >Files\Windows Kits\NETFXSDK\4.6\include\um;C:\Program Files\Windows
> >Kits\8.1\include\shared;C:\Program Files\Windows
> >Kits\8.1\include\um;C:\Program Files\Windows Kits\8.1\include\winrt;
> 
> This look a lot like my laptop with VS2015 RC. The only WinSock2.h in your
> includes is C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Kits\8.1\Include\um\WinSock2.h
> size: 124371 bytes
> 
> On my development PC with a fresh VS2015 I am compiling PHP Beta 3 at the
> moment with the WinSock2.h in C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows
> Kits\10\Include\10.0.10240.0\um\WinSock2.h
> size: 120648 bytes
>
> The difference in size is enough to make you worry: 3723 bytes is not
negligible.
>  
I'm not working on UWP. If you work on bringing PHP to be UWP, please ask
other channels for support. I thought you wanted to solve your win7 issue
building PHP, so provided you the details of some win7 x86 setup. I wouldn't
invest my time answering on this otherwise.

Jan, the list is not a place to promote your builds. Maybe you should
reconsider  the behaviors spreading panics and rumours like you did with
openssl upgrades, vc14 dependencies, now with your UWP misinterpretation. If
you have some factual issue cases - please bring them up with a factual
evidence. It is your choice to do things you do and to be taken seriously or
not. Spreading wrong information doesn't really promote anyone. Three cases
mentioned are enough for me as it costs my dev time and turns out to be a
spent force at the end (

> >However I did not experience any issue. Just install and go ahead. Not
> >sure it'll help you anyway. Using the IE images is probably not optimal.
> 
> I tried one IE image from dev.modern.ie and concluded the same. That is
why I
> am building a new Windows 7 Pro x64 machine. Like ol' times: format C:\
and
> install Win 7 Pro from a DVD/iso with Win7 SP1.
> --
You won't be able to target UWP on win7 or win8. Please read the
documentation carefully. Good luck.

Thanks.

Anatol.