Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Primary Constructors

[email protected] (Seifeddine Gmati)
Newsgroups php.internals
Message-ID <CAFyg4HiO4JVwtLAr9trncxEXNqio5tUFq0yL-pChV=DtMNgO3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 29 Jun 2026 at 01:18, Rob Landers <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello internals,
>
> I'd like to put forward Primary Constructors for comment.
>
> An implementation PR will be opened later today (UTC), and the RFC updated with this discussion thread.
>
> — Rob

Hi Rob,

Personally, I really dislike this feature.

It adds a new syntax that increases the complexity of the PHP grammar,
which is already quite complex, for no real advantage. It's just a
slightly different way to write something the language already
expresses.

It's also confusing to read. A line like:

```
class Foo(public int $a, public string $b) extends Base($a, $b) { ... }
```

jumps from class definition, to constructor definition, to class
definition again (inheritance), to what is effectively a
`parent::__construct()` call, and then back into the class body.
That's a lot of distinct concepts packed into a single line, with no
syntactic separation to signal the shift from one to the next.

Cheers,
Seifeddine.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.