Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Primary Constructors

Hi

Am 2026-06-29 20:44, schrieb Eric Norris:
> I'm afraid of going off-topic, but I disagree that "readonly is
> broken." In what way is it broken? A large part of the disagreement in
> the previous "readonly hooks" RFC was over the *meaning* of readonly.
> I'd have to fully go back to remind myself of the nuance, but my
> recollection is that it works exactly how I (and others, per the vote
> outcome) expect.
> 
> […]
> 
> This is not meant to be a combative email by the way, I just want to
> make sure it's clear that I believe readonly is not something that we
> should remove or consider baggage.

I'm in full agreement on the quoted sections.

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus