Re: [PDO] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2
[email protected] (Christopher Jones)
| Newsgroups | php.pdo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andi Gutmans wrote: > - JDBC like solution - Spec only as a set of interfaces/contracts (also > under some collaboration agreement although there may be an option not > to have that); drivers are fully implemented by the vendors; there is no > PDO core in this option. I didn't like this for three reasons; we lose > the advantage of having shared infrastructure for the various drivers > which ultimately may make it harder to make fixes and/or improvements > propagate to the various drivers, it may encourage less sharing of > knowledge between the vendors, and we would need to deal with symbol > namespacing issues to make sure the different drivers don't clash at > runtime. We'd support this. From my last set discussions internally, we'd need the spec to be under CLA. From my point of view, the interesting crux of the PDO discussions is that the development and release _process_ is the key factor in determining what risk (and hence need for CLA's and licenses) exists. Chris -- Christopher Jones, Oracle Email: [email protected] Tel: +1 650 506 8630 Blog: http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/ Free PHP Book: http://tinyurl.com/f8jad