Re: [PDO] PDO 2: Request for Comments
[email protected] (Lukas Kahwe Smith)
| Newsgroups | php.pdo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 25.01.2008, at 19:40, Bill Karwin wrote: > Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: >> But what if people who would otherwise be regular contributors are >> not signing? > There does not appear to be a large supply of such people, judging > from past contributions to PDO. > > There *are* people among the RDBMS vendors who wish to contribute, > but my understanding is that most of them prefer the contribution > process to include a CLA, so that it's clear that all IP in the > project is unencumbered and is free for use. Well I have felt the PDO development process quite alienating myself. I am not a C hacker, but I think I can rightfully claim that I knew more about designing a unified database API than most of the people that were involved in the decision making process in the end. I was there form day one (a stroll in the park at LinuxTag 2003 IIRC). I am sure there would have been ways I could have contributed (tests, documentation) if I would have felt that my contributions would have been taken seriously. Anyways, its true there are not that many people active in PDO development atm and maybe you are right in saying that instead of waiting for new developers, we should go with that offer. However I feel we are not that far with the core infrastructure with PDO. The key missing thing are tests to make sure that we do not have needless inconsistencies. That is something I do not think any of the vendors really need a CLA to contribute to. Maybe thats the first thing for them to do, to show their real world commitment. That might encourage enough developers to join the actual fixing and expanding of PDO already? regards, Lukas