Re: [PEAR-DOC] raison why revcheck have been suppress from peardoc

Hi laurent and thanks for your answer.

On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:37:14 +0100, Laurent Laville
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello yannick,
> 
>> Hi Laurent,
>> 
>> Do you know the raison why revcheck have been suppress from peardoc ?
>> 
>> Translator need it... peardoc don't need to be translated ?!
>> 
>> Yannick
>> 
> 
> First, if you want to have a chance to be read (by a large audience), 
> and talk about a subject, don't reuse a CVS commit that has nothing to 
> do with purpose.

Yes. Sur. It was a stupid error :/ sorry.

> 
> Second, as I don't know the raison about revcheck, I've begin to search 
> on archive mailing list. And I found this one [1], that introduced your 
> question.
> 
> Laurent
> 
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=phpdoc&m=122624453401202&w=2

I haven't read this post for now...

Perhaps it would be a great thinks that re-enable revcheck for pear since a
new solution was found ?

> 
> 
>