svn: /pear/peardoc/trunk/en/chapters/rfcs/ header-comments.xml

ashnazg                                  Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:43:11 +0000

Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=288243

Log:
literal $Id$ and $Revision$ keywords used in sentences should not have been expanded by CVS

Changed paths:
    U   pear/peardoc/trunk/en/chapters/rfcs/header-comments.xml

Modified: pear/peardoc/trunk/en/chapters/rfcs/header-comments.xml
===================================================================
--- pear/peardoc/trunk/en/chapters/rfcs/header-comments.xml	2009-09-10 14:19:03 UTC (rev 288242)
+++ pear/peardoc/trunk/en/chapters/rfcs/header-comments.xml	2009-09-10 14:43:11 UTC (rev 288243)
@@ -262,10 +262,10 @@
       docblocks will use <literal>@package_version@</literal>, which gets
       replaced with the release's version number by the PEAR installer.</para>

-      <para>This seems the best compromise because <literal>$Id: header-comments.xml,v 1.4 2009-05-04 20:16:19 cweiske Exp $</literal>'s
+      <para>This seems the best compromise because <literal>$Id$</literal>'s
       talk about files while the release version numbers talk about the
-      classes. <literal>$Id: header-comments.xml,v 1.4 2009-05-04 20:16:19 cweiske Exp $</literal> is used rather than
-      <literal>$Revision: 1.4 $</literal> or other shorter tags because it is the
+      classes. <literal>$Id$</literal> is used rather than
+      <literal>$Revision$</literal> or other shorter tags because it is the
       standard and provides all of the potentially desired information.</para>
     </section>