Re: Jesus Espino - qa team?
[email protected] ("Daniel O'Connor")
| Newsgroups | php.pear.qa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2010/8/9 Jesús Espino <[email protected]> > Thanks. > > I have some questions: > > 1. I want to maintain a orphaned package (not only apply patches of > fix some bugs), i can add me as leader, or better fix the bugs as QA > member?? > Better to do it with your QA hat on. 2. when a package is orphaned i d need to ask anybody to fix bugs?? > Nope! Just don't break anything :) > 3. On orphaned packages QA members act as leaders?? close > fixed/bogus bugs, apply patches, etc?? > > That's it in one. > Greetings. > > > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Daniel O'Connor > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Summary of votes: > > Ken Guest: +1 > > Daniel O'Connor: +1 > > David Coallier: + 1 > > Michael Gauthier: +1 > > > > Not technically enough according to > > http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=60 ; but I would > suggest > > it's within the spirit of the RFC. > > > > So, Jesus - congratulations, welcome to the QA team. If you haven't > already > > I would suggest you subscribe to pear-qa to participate in discussions > like > > this. > > > > Also; have a read through the above link for the ins and outs of what we > do. > > > > Some obvious things to point out: > > 1. You have the svn/pearweb/political clout to go in and fix bugs in > > packages if they are serious (BC breaks, parse errors, security, etc); or > > ignored for over a month after you've hassled the authors. > > 2. If you do bugfixes/etc; ensure you mention it in the relevant svn > > commits > > 3. As above for releases: if you are releasing a package for QA > purposes, > > whack "QA release" into the changelog > > 4. Try to work with existing maintainers and give them a chance to fix > > things up. > > 5. Obviously you don't need to become a maintainer on all of the > packages > > > > Let us know if you've got questions > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Daniel O'Connor < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> He's floating around doing QA work; and it'll be simpler than adding him > >> as a maintainer everywhere > >> Votes? > > > > >