Re: QA karma, clockwerx

Hi Daniel,

Le 26/10/2010 03:55, Daniel O'Connor a écrit :
> Hey all,
> I think one of the problems we have is that written and unwritten 
> rules aren't really enforced too often. I pissed a lot of active 
> maintainers off recently, and did so by breaking an unwritten rule 
> about communication.

Hey, I'm sorry if I sounded negative, you didn't pissed me off at all.
I'm just a being a bit wary regarding automated builds (and automated 
tools in general)...

>
> I think it would be healthy to bring this issue to a head; so... 
> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=60
>
> Should clockwerx retain QA karma?
> +1 / -1

a big +1 of course.

>
> Though the rules say vote-on-list, but due to the nature of the vote 
> (some may not feel comfortable being public); David Coallier, can you 
> collate instead and publish the results back here?
>
> The rules state a 50% majority needed; of simply these folks:
>
>     * Tobias Schlitt <http://pear.php.net/user/toby>
>     * David Costa <http://pear.php.net/user/gurugeek>
>     * Klaus Guenther <http://pear.php.net/user/thesaur>
>     * Arnaud Limbourg <http://pear.php.net/user/arnaud>
>     * Stephan Schmidt <http://pear.php.net/user/schst>
>     * Davey Shafik <http://pear.php.net/user/davey>
>     * Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson <http://pear.php.net/user/dufuz>
>     * Ken Guest <http://pear.php.net/user/kguest>
>     * Daniel O'Connor <http://pear.php.net/user/doconnor>
>     * Jesús Espino <http://pear.php.net/user/jespino>
>
> However, a lot of these folks aren't active in PEAR at the moment, and 
> a lot of the folks affected (izi, till, avb, rqualdling are the ones I 
> noticed) aren't on that list - I would like to include them, or anyone 
> in the PEAR group who wishes to vote either way.
>
> Could I ask for a rough deadline of Monday November 8th (approx 2 weeks)?

This vote is not needed at all.
You are currently the most active developer and I'm sure most of us are 
very grateful (I am) for the efforts and time you put in making PEAR better.

Regards,

-- 
David