Re: [PEAR-QA] QA karma, clockwerx
[email protected] (Ken Guest)
| Newsgroups | php.pear.qa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Daniel O'Connor <[email protected]>wrote: > Hey all, > I think one of the problems we have is that written and unwritten rules > aren't really enforced too often. I pissed a lot of active maintainers off > recently, and did so by breaking an unwritten rule about communication. > > I think it would be healthy to bring this issue to a head; so... > http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=60 > > Should clockwerx retain QA karma? > +1 / -1 > > +1 Though I have to agree with David about having too much trust in automated tools and such; iirc the suite of Date_Holidays packages required a lot of attention after having been mangled by those tools in order to get them back into an installable state. Ken -- http://blogs.linux.ie/kenguest/