Re: QA karma, clockwerx

[email protected] (Alexey Borzov)
Newsgroups php.pear.qa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Daniel,

On 26.10.2010 5:55, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> I think one of the problems we have is that written and unwritten rules aren't
> really enforced too often. I pissed a lot of active maintainers off recently,
> and did so by breaking an unwritten rule about communication.
>
> I think it would be healthy to bring this issue to a head; so...
> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=60
>
> Should clockwerx retain QA karma?
> +1 / -1

+1

Daniel, you are helping PEAR a lot with your work, though it does sometimes seem 
to me that your main goal is quantity of fixes. Please don't rely completely on 
automated tools and do some manual sanity checks.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.