Re: QA karma, clockwerx
[email protected] (David Coallier)
| Newsgroups | php.pear.qa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
For what it's worth even if I'm not a member of the QA Group I'd like to cast my +1. Your work is greatly needed and appreciated. On 26 October 2010 09:56, Alexey Borzov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > > On 26.10.2010 5:55, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > >> I think one of the problems we have is that written and unwritten rules >> aren't >> really enforced too often. I pissed a lot of active maintainers off >> recently, >> and did so by breaking an unwritten rule about communication. >> >> I think it would be healthy to bring this issue to a head; so... >> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=60 >> >> Should clockwerx retain QA karma? >> +1 / -1 >> > > +1 > > Daniel, you are helping PEAR a lot with your work, though it does sometimes > seem to me that your main goal is quantity of fixes. Please don't rely > completely on automated tools and do some manual sanity checks. > -- David Coallier, CTO echolibre, +353 86 3209369 skype://david.coallier, @davidcoallier