PEAR issues

There are a few issues that have not been discussed thoroughly I think

a1) do we have a designated Karma spender for PEAR
a2) shouldn't we (at least for PEAR where new people are more likely to 
appear in the future) have one?
If Rasmus likes to keep it in his hands, these questions are void.

b) PEAR should remain clearly arranged, thus how do we differntiate 
between exotic and common code

c) PEAR wants high-quality code, sure, but how do we review the code? I 
would suggest we create a subfolder in PEAR like /experimental or even 
/upload with public access, where people can upload code for review?

to extend (b) maybe the structure could be like this...
/common
/collective
/experimental
???

comments please (and sorry if anything has been discussed before, I 
missed a few PEAR mails),
andré


-- 
· André Langhorst        t: +49 331 5811560 ·
· [email protected]          m: +49 173 9558736 ·
* PHP Quality Assurance  http://qa.php.net  *