Re: [PHP3] Re: [PHP Template] Template Discussion

[email protected] (Andrei Zmievski) Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:47:24 -0600
Newsgroups php.template
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, James Moore wrote:
> I think that php might well loose performance and become more duanting for
> people to learn as a new webdevlopment package if there are 2 syntax's.

PHP is not going to have 2 syntaxes.

> If you feel strongly about it perhaps you should write it yourself and
> distribute it as an additonal libary to php but I dont think the php
> organisation should support a new syntax and overall complication of the
> language. I also think we should try and aviod a split in devlopments of
> php, ending up with 1 template supporting version and one nontemplate
> version as portability is upmost as well.

I feel troubled that some people view this template engine as adding
another syntax to PHP itself. It's not changing PHP at all. It's simply
another extension which allows you to use templates, if you so desire.
"PHP might lose performance"? Why, because it has template engine as an
optional extension? What "split in the development of PHP" are you
talking about? I'm completely baffled.

-Andrei
* Only 19,999 lines of C++ to my next ski trip... *