Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Reorganization and splitting

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Gwynne Raskind
<[email protected]> wrote:
> In order to progress further on the SVN conversion, I need to know how many
> projects need separate repositories from php-src, and the purpose and active
> status of *all* the current CVS modules. The complete list of current CVS
> modules is appended to the end of this e-mail. Anyone with status
> information on them, please step forward and let me know. And anyone who
> knows which projects need to be their own SVN repository, instead of merged
> with that of php-src, also please let me know.
>
> -- Gwynne, Daughter of the Code
> "This whole world is an asylum for the incurable."
>
> TSRM
> Zend
> ZendAPI
> ZendEngine2
> bindlib_w32
> bugtracker
> cvsgd.tar.gz
> dialin
> docstuff
> docweb
> embed
> embed-web
> fastcgi-isapi
> functable
> gd
> imapd
> jpgraph
> livedocs
> lxr
> old-php-gtk-modules
> pdo-specs
> pear
> pear-core
> pear-manual
> pearbot
> peardoc
> peardoc.backup
> pearweb
> pecl
> pecl4win
> peclweb
> phd
> php-bugs-web
> php-gcov-web
> php-gtk
> php-gtk-doc
> php-gtk-web
> php-hosts-web
> php-internals-win
> php-lang
> php-master-web
> php-news-web
> php-objc
> php-src
> php-testfest-web
> php-wiki-web
> php3
> php4.fubar
> php4.unused
> phpdoc
> phpdoc-ar
> phpdoc-ar-only
> phpdoc-bg
> phpdoc-ca
> phpdoc-cs
> phpdoc-da
> phpdoc-de
> phpdoc-el
> phpdoc-es
> phpdoc-fa
> phpdoc-fa_IR
> phpdoc-fi
> phpdoc-fr
> phpdoc-he
> phpdoc-hk
> phpdoc-hu
> phpdoc-id
> phpdoc-it
> phpdoc-ja
> phpdoc-kr
> phpdoc-lt
> phpdoc-nl
> phpdoc-no
> phpdoc-pl
> phpdoc-pt
> phpdoc-pt_BR
> phpdoc-ro
> phpdoc-ru
> phpdoc-sk
> phpdoc-sl
> phpdoc-sv
> phpdoc-tr
> phpdoc-tw
> phpdoc-zh
> phpfi
> phpoc_de
> phpweb
> portal
> pres
> pres2
> presentations
> qaweb
> smarty
> smarty-web
> systems
> win-installer
> zend
> zlib
>
>
> --
> SVN Migration Project Mailing List (http://svn.php.net)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

Hi Gwynne,

Speaking for win-installer, it doesn't need it's own repository.
Currently it operates independently of the various CVS branches, but
going forward I would like to see it not be that way so I can remove
version specific hacks from the build scripts.

Let me know what further assistance I can provide.

Thanks!

-- 
John Mertic
[email protected] | http://jmertic.wordpress.com