Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Reorganization and splitting
[email protected] (Gwynne Raskind)
| Newsgroups | svn.migration |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Oct 29, 2008, at 9:25 PM, Wez Furlong wrote: >>> Want != need... what's the technical reason for having multiple >>> repos? >> I'm not sure I understand fully same repo vs. multiple repos issue >> - so if PECL lives in php-src repo, does it mean I can easily check >> out PHP source without checking out PECL? > Yeah, there's no problem with being selective about what you checkout. > > My question was more from a perspective of what do we gain by having > separate repos, when we lose for PECL (in particular) the ability to > merge (and track) changes between php-src and PECL. > > FWIW, I'm strongly opposed to having php-src and pecl be in separate > repos, because this kind of merging happens often. It's a maitenance question. Each repository has its own authorization/ authentication scheme, set of hook scripts, etc. For people like GTK and PEAR, these would be an improvement over the current merged setup. PECL and php-src will stay together. -- Gwynne, Daughter of the Code "This whole world is an asylum for the incurable."