Re: Fw: [PECL-DEV] Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Reorganization and splitting

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:21, Steph Fox <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [CCing all relevant mailinglists]
>
> "All relevant mailinglists" apparently doesn't include anything PHP-GTK
> related.

Sorry, but since I have no voting karma or even access to PHP-GTK
related stuff I simply forgot about it - and didn't even mention it in
the vote.


>> I would like _all_ *.php.net websites to be under the repository.
>
> I'd be interested to know why websites are suddenly more important than
> source code?

Please explain, I have no idea how you got that out of anything?


>> NOTE: This does _NOT_ include gd or other "PHP umbrella projects",
>> *only* *.php.net!
>>
>> GD (and potentially) other "PHP umbrella" projects will have to make
>> their own decisions as I have no "authority" (aka: ego) there.
>
> Their own decisions as to whether they continue to be hosted in the php.net
> repository following a switch in the host's base technology?

Exactly, their own decisions. I have no intentions of stepping over
the boundaries and voting on things that I have no damn clue about.
That vote was for things I have clue about, nothing more, nothing less.


>> qa.php.net, php.net, pear.php.net, pecl, snaps, pecl4win, docweb,
>> windows, wiki [and probably more I forgot about].
>
> php-gtk
> php-gtk-doc
> php-gtk-web

php-gtk? php-gtk-doc? Into the website repository? I think you are
confusing things here.. There will be *multiple* repositories. One for
phpdoc (with several modules (translations)). One for websites (with
several modules(phpweb, master, bugs..)). One for php-src (with
several modules (TSRM, pecl, Zend...))...
I'm pretty sure Andrei voted for PHP-GTK to have their own repository
earlier in the thread too.


>> I talked this over with Helgi (pear-webmaster@) and he totally agrees.
>
> Hannes and Helgi do a fine job, but they do not run the whole of php.net,
> and special-interest mailing lists aren't generally the best place to make
> any kind of major announcement that affects that whole.

Which is exactly why I CCed to all the mailinglists the vote affected.
Some people actually got annoyed over the fact I did and meant that
people who care should subscribe to this list.

-Hannes