Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Current status

On Dec 15, 2008, at 11:17 PM, shire wrote:
> Thanks.  I do usually work in svn repositories on this level, as  
> sometimes it's more useful to have all the branches for copying/ 
> moving/reference etc.  For my uses of PHP I probably won't need this  
> either, but while I agree it may not be necessary (and perhaps not  
> always wanted due to size), I'm not sure if other people will want  
> to work this way or not if they touch a lot more branches and/or  
> tags. (?).

If more people have the same issue, we'll look into dealing with it. A  
lot of those branches and tags are probably bogus artifacts of the  
conversion process and poor CVS repo maintenance over the years.

>>>> Sweet, how often is this updated?
>> At the moment it's not synchronized to CVS in any way. It will be  
>> occassionally updated if and when I have cause to re-run the entire  
>> conversion. I have no plans at the moment to do a synchronization  
>> scheme; it will be a flip-a-switch change when SVN goes into effect.
> Makes sense, I'm sure the conversion process isn't a short one ;-).   
> thanks!

You've got that right! It runs about 14 hours on the CVS/SVN box :).

-- Gwynne, Daughter of the Code
"This whole world is an asylum for the incurable."