Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Github or not?

On Apr 3, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> We have seen little movement on anything for a while.  Could I get a
> simple yay/nay on moving things forward with Github?  No need for
> long-winded diatribes, just a gut-feeling yay or nay either way is  
> fine.
>
> If we do decide to go down this road, we will need to think quite a  
> bit
> about how we map our current workflow to Github.  I think this would
> include an easy to follow page on how you do common things with git  
> and
> github, and perhaps even some screencasts.
>
> There are 35 subscribers here.  We have only heard from a handful so
> far.  Hoping for a few more responses this time.

At the moment, I don't have the time to devote to finishing the SVN  
move, so the Github option might be a good viable alternative. For the  
record, I know very little about Git (despite several attempts to make  
sense of it), thusly I'd be of little use helping with that move. From  
what I've read in the threads about it, it seems like there's a lot of  
good things about Github and not very many bad things; my personal  
feeling is that PHP would probably benefit more from Github than from  
the homebrewed SVN stuff I've cooked up :).

-- Gwynne