Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Argh!

[email protected] (Pierre Joye) Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:20:08 +0200
Newsgroups svn.migration
Message-ID <[email protected]>
hi,

On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Herman Radtke<[email protected]> wrote:

> Is there still serious consideration about restructuring the layout?

I hope it will not be changed neither delay the move to SVN (not going
back to CVS).

The current layout looks perfectly fine, even for PECL or other web
stuff. Yes, it is different from what we had with CVS but what we have
done was not exactly clean either.

The layout issue is related to operation like full checkout of PECL,
which makes little sense in day to day operations. Only repetitive
tasks do such thing (backups, web updates, tests, etc.) and they are
done using scripts. What I would suggest is to keep it as it is now
and get used to it :)

However, Rasmus concerns are actually valid, what's the status about
them (perf issues with rsync and related tools)?

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org