Re: [UG-ADMINS] [Results] - Vote - Move to a new list
[email protected] (Ben Ramsey) Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:27:17 -0500
| Newsgroups | ug.admins |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Staying on php.net does not preclude converting this to a "private" list. The php.net mailing list software can support private lists right now. My concern is in what "private" means to everyone and what level of control the group wants to accept/reject members and/or posts. What does moderation and membership look like for a private global user group leadership mailing list/forum? - Ben > On Apr 26, 2016, at 12:33, Sean Prunka <[email protected]> wrote: > > It really sounds like there is a strong division between those who want to > keep it public and those who want to make it private. > > Could we not find a means of doing both, preferably in a single venue? > > Public posts for regular conversations and announcements; private posts for > sensitive issues? > > I see great value in both of these aspects personally. > > I know staying with the PHP.net mailing list precludes that as a > possibility. > > If the group shares my opinion that both features are valuable, I volunteer > myself to research a better delivery method that would give us access to > both public and private conversations/posts. > > Then, with one or more possible venues, we can hold a new vote? > > --Sean Prunka > Founder of the long defunct "CHOPUG". >> On Apr 26, 2016 1:23 PM, "Joe Ferguson" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Ugh, listserv is bouncing my emails as well, Clarifying my statement: If >> we want a private place, that could be private google groups, slack >> channel, etc. >> >> -- >> - Joe Ferguson >> JoeFerguson.me >> MemphisPHP.org >> >>> On Apr 26, 2016, at 12:21, Cal Evans <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I am against a Slack channel based solely on the fact that slack is >> closed >>> source and closed protocol. At least with email, if one vendor shuts >> down, >>> we can move to another. >>> >>> IF we were going to discuss the idea of moving off of php.net < >> http://php.net/>, I would >>> suggest a google group. The group would be open to anyone to join without >>> verification or validation, but we could easily ban spammers, bad actors, >>> etc. >>> >>> Just my $0.02 worth, >>> =C= >>> (Beth, Joe, Adam, sorry for the repost, the original bounced. dear lord >> I hate this listserv) >>> >>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Joe Ferguson <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> While I’m sad this vote didn’t pass, one thing I draw from the vote is >> that most of us don’t want to move because of the uncertainty of where that >> move would be to? My yes vote was purely based on a few discussions around >> having a private place to discuss sensitive matters among other user group >> leaders. I think there is still value to do something like that. A private >> google group (mailing list) would work well for this. Alternatively, as >> much as I dislike Slack, this seems like a valid use case for it. A private >> slack channel (on the phpug slack would likely fit best assuming the admins >> there are open to it) would probably be the best fit. >>> >>> thanks, >>> -- >>> - Joe Ferguson >>> JoeFerguson.me >>> MemphisPHP.org >>> >>>> On Apr 26, 2016, at 12:04, Adam Culp <[email protected] <mailto: >> [email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thank you Beth for finalizing this. While I was a proponent of the >> group remaining open, which prompted my "no" vote, I liked the idea of >> moving it somewhere more functional. (the vote was combined) >>>> >>>> I would love to see someone (with more time than I have) either >> interact with the php.net <http://php.net/> team to make this better, or >> perhaps cast another follow-up campaign to move the list to anther place >> that is still open but has more functional. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Adam Culp >>>> 561-870-6361 <tel:561-870-6361> >>>> Twitter: @adamculp >>>> Tech Blog: http://geekyboy.com <http://geekyboy.com/> >>>> Podcast: http://rungeekradio.com <http://rungeekradio.com/> >>>> Running Blog: http://crazyfloridian.com <http://crazyfloridian.com/> >>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/adamculp < >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/adamculp> >>>> >>>>> On 04/26/2016 12:18 PM, Beth Tucker Long wrote: >>>>> Here is the tally of the vote we took in March: >>>>> >>>>> 14 - No >>>>> 12 - Yes >>>>> ----------- >>>>> Motion fails. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Here is the breakdown of the votes I have: >>>>> >>>>> -1 (PHP Hampshire - James Titcumb) >>>>> -1 (SoFloPHP - Adam Culp) >>>>> -1 (PHP Minds - Antonios Pavlakis) >>>>> -1 (New York PHP - Hans Zaunere) >>>>> -1 (PHP Argentina - Mariano Iglesias) >>>>> -1 (PHPBenelux - Michelangelo van Dam) >>>>> -1 (DPHPDC - Jun Notz) >>>>> -1 (PHPBelfast - Tim Swann) >>>>> -1 (ZgPHP - Luka Muzinic) >>>>> -1 (BrightonPHP - Rich Sage) >>>>> -1 (PHPSW - Oliver Davies) >>>>> -1 (AmsterdamPHP - Rafael Dohms) >>>>> -1 (PHP Jagruti - Ajinkya Nahar) >>>>> -1 (Milwaukee PHP - Joel Clermont) >>>>> ------------------------------------------------- >>>>> 14 No's >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +1 (PHP Surrey - Michael Cullum) >>>>> +1 (ZürichPHP - Michelle Sanver) >>>>> +1 (UpstatePHP - Steven Wade) >>>>> +1 (Madison PHP - Beth Tucker Long) >>>>> +1 (Minnesota PHP - Jonathan Sundquist) >>>>> +1 (MemphisPHP - Joe Ferguson) >>>>> +1 (PHP Quebec - Eric Hogue) >>>>> +1 (SDPHP - John Congdon) >>>>> +1 (PHP Warwickshire - Ben Plummer) >>>>> +1 (DCPHP - Samantha Quiñones) >>>>> +1 (Baltimore PHP - Chris Stone) >>>>> +1 (PHP Leuven - Bart Reunes) >>>>> ------------------------------------------------- >>>>> 12 Yes's >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Usergroup Coordination Mailing List (http://ug.php.net < >> http://ug.php.net/>) >>>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php < >> http://www.php.net/unsub.php> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Usergroup Coordination Mailing List (http://ug.php.net < >> http://ug.php.net/>) >>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php < >> http://www.php.net/unsub.php> >> >>