Re: [UG-ADMINS] [Results] - Vote - Move to a new list

[email protected] (Ben Ramsey) Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:27:17 -0500
Newsgroups ug.admins
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Staying on php.net does not preclude converting this to a "private" list. The php.net mailing list software can support private lists right now.

My concern is in what "private" means to everyone and what level of control the group wants to accept/reject members and/or posts. What does moderation and membership look like for a private global user group leadership mailing list/forum?

- Ben


> On Apr 26, 2016, at 12:33, Sean Prunka <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> It really sounds like there is a strong division between those who want to
> keep it public and those who want to make it private.
> 
> Could we not find a means of doing both, preferably in a single venue?
> 
> Public posts for regular conversations and announcements; private posts for
> sensitive issues?
> 
> I see great value in both of these aspects personally.
> 
> I know staying with the PHP.net mailing list precludes that as a
> possibility.
> 
> If the group shares my opinion that both features are valuable, I volunteer
> myself to research a better delivery method that would give us access to
> both public and private conversations/posts.
> 
> Then, with one or more possible venues, we can hold a new vote?
> 
> --Sean Prunka
> Founder of the long defunct "CHOPUG".
>> On Apr 26, 2016 1:23 PM, "Joe Ferguson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Ugh, listserv is bouncing my emails as well, Clarifying my statement: If
>> we want a private place, that could be private google groups, slack
>> channel, etc.
>> 
>> --
>> - Joe Ferguson
>> JoeFerguson.me
>> MemphisPHP.org
>> 
>>> On Apr 26, 2016, at 12:21, Cal Evans <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I am against a Slack channel based solely on the fact that slack is
>> closed
>>> source and closed protocol. At least with email, if one vendor shuts
>> down,
>>> we can move to another.
>>> 
>>> IF we were going to discuss the idea of moving off of php.net <
>> http://php.net/>, I would
>>> suggest a google group. The group would be open to anyone to join without
>>> verification or validation, but we could easily ban spammers, bad actors,
>>> etc.
>>> 
>>> Just my $0.02 worth,
>>> =C=
>>> (Beth, Joe, Adam, sorry for the repost, the original bounced. dear lord
>> I hate this listserv)
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Joe Ferguson <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> While I’m sad this vote didn’t pass, one thing I draw from the vote is
>> that most of us don’t want to move because of the uncertainty of where that
>> move would be to? My yes vote was purely based on a few discussions around
>> having a private place to discuss sensitive matters among other user group
>> leaders. I think there is still value to do something like that. A private
>> google group (mailing list) would work well for this. Alternatively, as
>> much as I dislike Slack, this seems like a valid use case for it. A private
>> slack channel (on the phpug slack would likely fit best assuming the admins
>> there are open to it) would probably be the best fit.
>>> 
>>> thanks,
>>> --
>>> - Joe Ferguson
>>> JoeFerguson.me
>>> MemphisPHP.org
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 26, 2016, at 12:04, Adam Culp <[email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you Beth for finalizing this. While I was a proponent of the
>> group remaining open, which prompted my "no" vote, I liked the idea of
>> moving it somewhere more functional. (the vote was combined)
>>>> 
>>>> I would love to see someone (with more time than I have) either
>> interact with the php.net <http://php.net/> team to make this better, or
>> perhaps cast another follow-up campaign to move the list to anther place
>> that is still open but has more functional.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Adam Culp
>>>> 561-870-6361 <tel:561-870-6361>
>>>> Twitter: @adamculp
>>>> Tech Blog: http://geekyboy.com <http://geekyboy.com/>
>>>> Podcast: http://rungeekradio.com <http://rungeekradio.com/>
>>>> Running Blog: http://crazyfloridian.com <http://crazyfloridian.com/>
>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/adamculp <
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/adamculp>
>>>> 
>>>>> On 04/26/2016 12:18 PM, Beth Tucker Long wrote:
>>>>> Here is the tally of the vote we took in March:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 14 - No
>>>>> 12 - Yes
>>>>> -----------
>>>>> Motion fails.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here is the breakdown of the votes I have:
>>>>> 
>>>>> -1 (PHP Hampshire - James Titcumb)
>>>>> -1 (SoFloPHP - Adam Culp)
>>>>> -1 (PHP Minds - Antonios Pavlakis)
>>>>> -1 (New York PHP - Hans Zaunere)
>>>>> -1 (PHP Argentina - Mariano Iglesias)
>>>>> -1 (PHPBenelux - Michelangelo van Dam)
>>>>> -1 (DPHPDC - Jun Notz)
>>>>> -1 (PHPBelfast - Tim Swann)
>>>>> -1 (ZgPHP - Luka Muzinic)
>>>>> -1 (BrightonPHP - Rich Sage)
>>>>> -1 (PHPSW - Oliver Davies)
>>>>> -1 (AmsterdamPHP - Rafael Dohms)
>>>>> -1 (PHP Jagruti - Ajinkya Nahar)
>>>>> -1 (Milwaukee PHP - Joel Clermont)
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------
>>>>> 14 No's
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> +1 (PHP Surrey - Michael Cullum)
>>>>> +1 (ZürichPHP - Michelle Sanver)
>>>>> +1 (UpstatePHP - Steven Wade)
>>>>> +1 (Madison PHP - Beth Tucker Long)
>>>>> +1 (Minnesota PHP - Jonathan Sundquist)
>>>>> +1 (MemphisPHP - Joe Ferguson)
>>>>> +1 (PHP Quebec - Eric Hogue)
>>>>> +1 (SDPHP - John Congdon)
>>>>> +1 (PHP Warwickshire - Ben Plummer)
>>>>> +1 (DCPHP - Samantha Quiñones)
>>>>> +1 (Baltimore PHP - Chris Stone)
>>>>> +1 (PHP Leuven - Bart Reunes)
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------
>>>>> 12 Yes's
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Usergroup Coordination Mailing List (http://ug.php.net <
>> http://ug.php.net/>)
>>>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php <
>> http://www.php.net/unsub.php>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Usergroup Coordination Mailing List (http://ug.php.net <
>> http://ug.php.net/>)
>>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php <
>> http://www.php.net/unsub.php>
>> 
>>