Re: [UG-ADMINS] OpenCFP but....smaller?

Out of curiosity, how would folks feel about an actual conference doing
something like this? Is there a consensus on how *speakers* feel about more
open/public CFP processes? I imagine attendees will typically appreciate
the transparency.


On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Kristopher <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I like this idea. Instead of issues, you can have them open a Pull Request
> to have their talk added to the "Talks" page. Accept their PR if you want
> them to talk, close it if you don't want them to. People can comment and
> give feedback.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Jonathan Sundquist <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > You could also use github and have people log issues.  Then you can allow
> > people comment on them if they thing its a good talk or not.
> >
> >
>