Re: [UG-ADMINS] Karma System
[email protected] (Tessa Mero)
| Newsgroups | ug.admins |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADzBJ9_AL9vaMspXyW5iTiSBH6KvQ_7Xd0bV0NKEyBu64dKMaA@mail.gmail.com> |
The first section was to Beth, and my question at the end was for Paulo. Thanks again for listening. On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Tessa Mero <[email protected]> wrote: > Beth, you bring up a great concern, and I immediately imagined a > workaround for that issue. > > What if each member starts out at a level: > > (imaginary group levels) > > - New Community Member > - Frequent Community Member > - Senior Community Member > > Then, each group can have it's own set of ways to earn points: (and again, > this is something I just made up as an example) > > - New Community Member > - Ask a question [1 pt] > - Reply to a post [0.5 pt] > - Write about something interesting you read in Web Development [1 > pt] > - Connect with a PHP mentor [3 pt] > - Log in each day [0.1 pt] > - Frequent Community Member > - Right a blog post [2 pt] > - Assist with someones question [1 pt] > - Log in each day [0.1 pt] > - Senior Community Member > - Assist with someones question [1 pt] > - Speak at a conf [1 pt] > - Attend a conf [1 pt] > - Set up to mentor a new community member [3 pt] > - Log in each day [0.1 pt] > > *Thinking deeper: * > > What if these points added up and gave you "upgraded" icons? Let's say, > 100 points earn's you an upgraded icon, let's call it a "Star". 2 star at > 200 points, 3 starts at 300 points. > The purpose of the stars (whatever icons) is to be able to "hold onto" the > reputation you've earned, if there is a case where you can "spend" your > points on donated prizes. > > Alternatively, rather than spending points or earning stars, you can earn > "titles" and be displayed on a scoreboard system or the "homepage" of > wherever this system will take place. > > > *Question: * > > How will you determine all the community members? Would we have to grit > our teeth trying to get everyone to register for the new web application? I > guess that's a good start to see who's actually "active". :-) > > > Just throwing out some thoughts. ;-) > > > > Tessa Mero > > PS - I'm not involved in this gamification process at all, just taking > interest in the subject. > > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Elizabeth Tucker Long < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Paulo, >> I can see how this information may be beneficial to organizers, but >> from a member's point of view, it seems like it is making UG membership >> into a scoreboard where your worth to the group is publicly displayed. I >> can only see this as something that would hurt the group. People who have >> lots of free time are more able to rack up the points, and now someone who >> is more busy or is a newer programmer (so they are not ready to contribute >> by speaking, programming, etc.) is now discounted as someone who is >> not-as-important. Also, how would new members ever be able to catch up to >> people who had been in the group longer? >> I'm all for letting UGs work on projects that they find useful for >> their specific use cases, but I feel that this project would only be >> divisive and does not foster a welcoming environment for many types of >> attendees. >> Beth >> >> >> >> >> On 4/27/15 2:12 PM, Paulo Eduardo wrote: >> >>> Hello all, how are you? >>> >>> A few months ago, someone here on the mailing list ask about a badge >>> system >>> to gamefy experience of the communities members, last saturday i talked >>> with Cal Evans at PHP Experience (a PHP Conference at São Paulo) about a >>> Karma system that we at PHPSP are thinking about, so he asked me to send >>> an >>> e-mail here explaining the idea. >>> >>> But first let me tell a bit more about the motivations of the idea, a few >>> of you may already know that PHPSP is the São Paulo User Group, and here >>> we >>> try to take decisions all together, something close to a democracy where >>> every active member have a voice on the community and can vote on >>> importante topics >>> >>> The problem is that is a little difficult to define "active member", só >>> we >>> thought about a karma system where the member can earn points of >>> participation in differente types of activities on the User Group, things >>> like: >>> >>> - Attende at an event >>> - Talk at an event >>> - Contribute on open source projects of the group >>> - Create content for the UG blog >>> - and so on.... >>> >>> So by doing any of those activities, the member will earn a predefined >>> number of points, and the total ammount of points the member has could >>> lead >>> to some benefits such as: >>> >>> - Discounts in events >>> - Badges >>> - Vote right >>> - Freebies like T-shirst and stickers >>> - Admim privileges at social networks >>> - and so on.... >>> >>> But the opposite is also true, the meber who spent a little while without >>> make any contributions to the communitie will also loose some points. >>> This >>> way we think we can put in numbers what is in fact being an "active >>> member". >>> >>> So the point of all this is that we was willing to make this system by >>> ourselfs at PHPSP, but this could became much better if the communities >>> all >>> over the world want to make a big one. So what do you think folks? Is it >>> a >>> good idea? are you willing to make it happen? >>> >>> Thanks a lot and sorry for the huge post. >>> Paulo Eduardo >>> www.pauloeduardo.com >>> www.psyco.com.br >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Usergroup Coordination Mailing List (http://ug.php.net) >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> >