Re: [UG-ADMINS] Karma System

[email protected] (Stuart Grimshaw)
Newsgroups ug.admins
Message-ID <CAB5rOncgKZyu3aRLBGOCdrbnuhiQhDNRcw-k1L63h=305o76dQ@mail.gmail.com>
I've always liked the idea of Whuffie from Cory Doctorow's "Down & Out In
the Magic Kingdom", I always thought that would work well in tech circles...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whuffie


-S

Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/stubbs
Blog: http://blog.stuartgrimshaw.co.uk/
GPG Key ID: 684CF089
GPG Key Fingerprint: 5E48 F78E 2904 478C F209 4A37 C446 73C2 684C F089

On 27 April 2015 at 21:47, Ben Ramsey <[email protected]> wrote:

> A while back, the idea of community "badges" sounded appealing to me, but
> after giving it a lot of thought, I'm not so sure it will work well at the
> local level.
>
> We have a duty as user group leaders to ensure that people feel welcome at
> our groups and to understand that each person participates at the level
> they feel comfortable. Just because someone participates at a "lower" level
> than us doesn't make their participation insignificant.
>
> Over the years, I have seen people who have only attended one or fewer
> meetings a year, who have lurked on the mailing list and IRC, posting very
> little (if at all). Yet, that passive participation still makes them feel
> like they are a part of the group; it is still THEIR group. They often read
> the messages and follow along, even if they don't appear active to us.
>
> I like having these people as members of the group. I want to encourage
> them to be more active, but even if they choose not to become more active
> (according to my definition of "active"), they should not be punished for
> their passive involvement. I think gamifying the user group would hurt
> their involvement and they may see it as a punishment for participating in
> their own way.
>
> This has led to a loose definition of "membership" for me. In fact, I try
> to keep it as loose as possible. In short, if you're signed up for the
> mailing list (or Meetup.com, or the forums, or whatever), then you're a
> member. It's that simple. (It also means I don't have to worry about
> defining what an "active member" is.)
>
> Just my $0.02. :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.