Re: [UG-ADMINS] Karma System
[email protected] (Stuart Grimshaw)
| Newsgroups | ug.admins |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAB5rOncgKZyu3aRLBGOCdrbnuhiQhDNRcw-k1L63h=305o76dQ@mail.gmail.com> |
I've always liked the idea of Whuffie from Cory Doctorow's "Down & Out In the Magic Kingdom", I always thought that would work well in tech circles... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whuffie -S Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/stubbs Blog: http://blog.stuartgrimshaw.co.uk/ GPG Key ID: 684CF089 GPG Key Fingerprint: 5E48 F78E 2904 478C F209 4A37 C446 73C2 684C F089 On 27 April 2015 at 21:47, Ben Ramsey <[email protected]> wrote: > A while back, the idea of community "badges" sounded appealing to me, but > after giving it a lot of thought, I'm not so sure it will work well at the > local level. > > We have a duty as user group leaders to ensure that people feel welcome at > our groups and to understand that each person participates at the level > they feel comfortable. Just because someone participates at a "lower" level > than us doesn't make their participation insignificant. > > Over the years, I have seen people who have only attended one or fewer > meetings a year, who have lurked on the mailing list and IRC, posting very > little (if at all). Yet, that passive participation still makes them feel > like they are a part of the group; it is still THEIR group. They often read > the messages and follow along, even if they don't appear active to us. > > I like having these people as members of the group. I want to encourage > them to be more active, but even if they choose not to become more active > (according to my definition of "active"), they should not be punished for > their passive involvement. I think gamifying the user group would hurt > their involvement and they may see it as a punishment for participating in > their own way. > > This has led to a loose definition of "membership" for me. In fact, I try > to keep it as loose as possible. In short, if you're signed up for the > mailing list (or Meetup.com, or the forums, or whatever), then you're a > member. It's that simple. (It also means I don't have to worry about > defining what an "active member" is.) > > Just my $0.02. :-) > > Cheers, > Ben >