Re: [UG-ADMINS] What about making this list public on https://www.mail-archive.com/
[email protected] (Cal Evans) Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:37:29 -0500
| Newsgroups | ug.admins |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPf=PyJXtq2rY9tZHtC=Z8uWnegns76RUxfRdk2g9hCVL2CkyQ@mail.gmail.com> |
I agree with Michael. My goal is to move to better tooling. Since php.net in the past has resisted changing anything, improving our UX will require moving off of php.net. I did not mean move away from PHP itself or disassociate with php.net. =C= On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Michael Cullum <[email protected]> wrote: > Lorna, > > I'd ask what does 'away from the main php.net project' mean? > > My perception of the change is just that we're moving onto a different tool > and would maintain the same affiliation with php.net that the ug-admins > group as there presently which is, as far as I can tell, just being linked > to from php.net (and perhaps coherance to any polices php.net has about > usage of lists.php.net). > > -- > Michael C > > On 30 January 2016 at 15:24, Lorna Mitchell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > By moving the list away from php.net, are we moving the user groups away > > from the main php.net project, or just choosing a different tooling? I > am > > unclear what structure a new list would be part of, so I'm unsure about > > this move but I'm definitely +1 on making it easier for user group > leaders > > to be in touch with one another. > > > > Lorna > > > > On 30 January 2016 at 08:46, Sean Prunka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > It seems that all the current venues are effectively open to the > public. > > > > > > This list, for public announcements. > > > IRC, for various discussions. > > > Slack, for inter-group coordination. > > > > > > Perhaps keeping all of these and adding a "closed" group mailing list > for > > > leadership concerns, advice, and the like might not be a bad idea. > > > > > > Each venue currently available (and proposed) adds value to a different > > > aspect of UG leadership and/or "daily" operations. > > > > > > I do also recognize that have to many disparate venues of communication > > > leads to disorganization, confusion, and the potential for > cross-posting > > > and mis-posting. > > > > > > I'm not sure where the happy medium exists. > > > > > > --Sean > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016, 03:23 Andreas Heigl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Sean. > > > > > > > > Am 30.01.16 um 08:05 schrieb Sean Prunka: > > > > > It sounds like there is a strong desire for a public facing > presence > > > that > > > > > is [perhaps] more accessible to new UGs and to the community at > large > > > > than > > > > > this list currently is; > > > > > > > > > > But at the same time, there is a desire for a private discussion > area > > > > where > > > > > we can "talk shop" about things specific to UG admins that do not > > need > > > to > > > > > be (and in some cases, perhaps should not be) publicly > > > > readable/accessible. > > > > > > > > > > Is there a convenient way to both have our cake and eat it too? > > > > > > > > I don't think there's a way to have *both* approaches in one single > > list. > > > > > > > > There is this list for UG-Admins with announcments and infos that is > > > > publicly available (if you know where to search for it) and there's > the > > > > IRC-Channel #phpgroups (which is always rather quiet). It's the "old > > > > school" INformation channel and especially the Mailinglist sometimes > > > > contains material that should not be publicly available in my eyes. > > > > Every Person running a usergroup should be registered here. > > > > > > > > And than there's the phpug-slack team at https://phpug.slack.com[1] > > > > where not only the usergroup-leaders are welcome to join but also the > > > > usergroup-members. I set that team up as part of php.ug to enable > > > > usergroups to easily interact with one another and to allow easy > > > > interaction between different usergroups. It has *never* been though > as > > > > a replacement to this mailinglist but as an addition! So far it seems > > to > > > > work out. So that would be a more public approach that is strongly > > > > frequented especially by new usergroups. > > > > > > > > And those two "solutions" can perfectyl coexist in my eyes. Or do you > > > > think otherwise? > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > Andreas > > > > > > > > [1] Get an invitation to the slack team from > > > > http://murmuring-forest-7062.herokuapp.com/ > > > > -- > > > > ,,, > > > > (o o) > > > > > +---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+ > > > > | Andreas Heigl > | > > > > | mailto:[email protected] N 50°22'59.5" E > 08°23'58" > > | > > > > | http://andreas.heigl.org > http://hei.gl/wiFKy7 > > | > > > > > +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > > | http://hei.gl/root-ca > > | > > > > > +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Lorna Mitchell > > http://lornajane.net > > >