Re: [UG-ADMINS] [VOTE] Move to a private life off of php.net

+1

Cheers

Cheops
PHP-AL / Brazil
Em 30/01/2016 5:56 PM, "Beth Tucker Long" <[email protected]>
escreveu:

> From my understanding of the previous discussion, we would not restrict
> membership to the list other than to, maybe, ask which user group they are
> an organizer for. Anyone could essentially join the list and see the
> archives, but they would not show up in publicly available searches, like
> Google, and they would not be available to the general public just browsing
> or searching on php.net.
>
> As for the suggestion to make the mailing list membership public, I'm not
> comfortable with this unless it is done in such a way that all of our
> contact information is not harvestable. I am also very hesitant to make it
> too easy to contact other members off-list or to encourage people to
> contact each other off-list.
>
> On that topic, if we decide to choose a new tool set for this group, I
> would like something that routes all communication through the mailing list
> and obfuscates our personal addresses a bit. This helps keep all
> discussions in front of the group and helps maintain privacy for people who
> may not want their personal email addresses made public.
>
> Beth
>
>
> Beth Tucker Long
> Treeline Design, LLC
> 807 Arbor Vitae Place
> Verona, WI 53593
> 608-770-6677
> http://www.TreelineDesign.com
>
> > On Jan 30, 2016, at 14:29, Eric <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I am on the fence with this. Where I understand the desire to have a
> private channel and people feeling more at ease opening discussing
> sensitive topics, at the same time, the Open Source in me says, ‘No, for
> better or worse we air it all out. We share and build a stronger community’
> Complete transparency. Let everyone know all the issues we work on
> addressing, how we address them, and how much we all care.
> >
> > My other concern would be vetting of the private list if we went that
> way. I do think, at very less, the list of the members of the private group
> should be public. Then we can police it a little ourselves making sure
> admin are not missed, and people trying to get on the list have several
> avenues of contact they can reach out to with questions.
> >
> > I am holding off on any voting, for now, to see if there are any more
> opinions on the topic but will place a vote by the end of the day tomorrow.
> >
> > --
> > Eric
> >
> > twitter: @shocm | @sdphp | http://www.sdphp.org
> > No trees were killed in sending this message, but a large number of
> electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
> >
> >> On January 30, 2016 at 10:25:43 AM, Jonathan Sundquist (
> [email protected]) wrote:
> >>
> >> I am +1 for making the list more private.
> >>
> >> Can we consider those that are +0 as a -1 since they show concerns and
> are
> >> not fully in favor of it?
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016, 12:11 PM Ben Ramsey <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > -1
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > On Jan 30, 2016, at 02:48, Cal Evans <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Please cast your vote +1 or -1 to move off of php.net to a private
> (but
> >> > not
> >> > > secret) list.
> >> > >
> >> > > Voting will remain open until Feb 6th.
> >> > >
> >> > > I will moderate the vote and tally the votes. Beth, if she will,
> will
> >> > > double check my math and certify the vote.
> >> > >
> >> > > This is a voting thread only. If you want to discuss use the other
> >> > thread.
> >> > >
> >> > > Cheers!
> >> > > =C=
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Usergroup Coordination Mailing List (http://ug.php.net)
> >> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >> >
> >> >
>