Re: [PATCH v1 16/36] fs: hugetlbfs: cleanup folio in adjust_range_hwpoison()

> 
> Lord above.
> 
> Also semantics of 'if bytes == 0, then check first page anyway' which you do
> capture.

Yeah, I think bytes == 0 would not make any sense, though. Staring 
briefly at the single caller, that seems to be the case (bytes != 0).

> 
> OK think I have convinced myself this is right, so hopefully no deeply subtle
> off-by-one issues here :P
> 
> Anyway, LGTM, so:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]>
> 
>> ---
>>   fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 33 +++++++++++----------------------
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> index c5a46d10afaa0..6ca1f6b45c1e5 100644
>> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> @@ -198,31 +198,20 @@ hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
>>   static size_t adjust_range_hwpoison(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
>>   		size_t bytes)
>>   {
>> -	struct page *page;
>> -	size_t n = 0;
>> -	size_t res = 0;
>> -
>> -	/* First page to start the loop. */
>> -	page = folio_page(folio, offset / PAGE_SIZE);
>> -	offset %= PAGE_SIZE;
>> -	while (1) {
>> -		if (is_raw_hwpoison_page_in_hugepage(page))
>> -			break;
>> +	struct page *page = folio_page(folio, offset / PAGE_SIZE);
>> +	size_t safe_bytes;
>> +
>> +	if (is_raw_hwpoison_page_in_hugepage(page))
>> +		return 0;
>> +	/* Safe to read the remaining bytes in this page. */
>> +	safe_bytes = PAGE_SIZE - (offset % PAGE_SIZE);
>> +	page++;
>>
>> -		/* Safe to read n bytes without touching HWPOISON subpage. */
>> -		n = min(bytes, (size_t)PAGE_SIZE - offset);
>> -		res += n;
>> -		bytes -= n;
>> -		if (!bytes || !n)
>> +	for (; safe_bytes < bytes; safe_bytes += PAGE_SIZE, page++)
> 
> OK this is quite subtle - so if safe_bytes == bytes, this means we've confirmed
> that all requested bytes are safe.
> 
> So offset=0, bytes = 4096 would fail this (as safe_bytes == 4096).
> 
> Maybe worth putting something like:
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Now we check page-by-page in the folio to see if any bytes we don't
> 	 * yet know to be safe are contained within posioned pages or not.
> 	 */
> 
> Above the loop. Or something like this.

"Check each remaining page as long as we are not done yet."

> 
>> +		if (is_raw_hwpoison_page_in_hugepage(page))
>>   			break;
>> -		offset += n;
>> -		if (offset == PAGE_SIZE) {
>> -			page++;
>> -			offset = 0;
>> -		}
>> -	}
>>
>> -	return res;
>> +	return min(safe_bytes, bytes);
> 
> Yeah given above analysis this seems correct.
> 
> You must have torn your hair out over this :)

I could resist the urge to clean that up, yes.

I'll also drop the "The implementation borrows the iteration logic from 
copy_page_to_iter*." part, because I suspect this comment no longer 
makes sense.

Thanks!

-- 
Cheers

David / dhildenb