Re: [PATCH v1 18/36] mm/gup: drop nth_page() usage within folio when recording subpages
David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | com.zx2c4.lists.wireguard,dev.linux.lists.iommu,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.io-uring,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.kernel.vger.linux-ide,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 28.08.25 18:37, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:01:22AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> nth_page() is no longer required when iterating over pages within a >> single folio, so let's just drop it when recording subpages. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> > > This looks correct to me, so notwithtsanding suggestion below, LGTM and: > > Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> > >> --- >> mm/gup.c | 7 +++---- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c >> index b2a78f0291273..89ca0813791ab 100644 >> --- a/mm/gup.c >> +++ b/mm/gup.c >> @@ -488,12 +488,11 @@ static int record_subpages(struct page *page, unsigned long sz, >> unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, >> struct page **pages) >> { >> - struct page *start_page; >> int nr; >> >> - start_page = nth_page(page, (addr & (sz - 1)) >> PAGE_SHIFT); >> + page += (addr & (sz - 1)) >> PAGE_SHIFT; >> for (nr = 0; addr != end; nr++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) >> - pages[nr] = nth_page(start_page, nr); >> + pages[nr] = page++; > > > This is really nice, but I wonder if (while we're here) we can't be even > more clear as to what's going on here, e.g.: > > static int record_subpages(struct page *page, unsigned long sz, > unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > struct page **pages) > { > size_t offset_in_folio = (addr & (sz - 1)) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > struct page *subpage = page + offset_in_folio; > > for (; addr != end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) > *pages++ = subpage++; > > return nr; > } > > Or some variant of that with the masking stuff self-documented. What about the following cleanup on top: diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c index 89ca0813791ab..5a72a135ec70b 100644 --- a/mm/gup.c +++ b/mm/gup.c @@ -484,19 +484,6 @@ static inline void mm_set_has_pinned_flag(struct mm_struct *mm) #ifdef CONFIG_MMU #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_GUP_FAST -static int record_subpages(struct page *page, unsigned long sz, - unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, - struct page **pages) -{ - int nr; - - page += (addr & (sz - 1)) >> PAGE_SHIFT; - for (nr = 0; addr != end; nr++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) - pages[nr] = page++; - - return nr; -} - /** * try_grab_folio_fast() - Attempt to get or pin a folio in fast path. * @page: pointer to page to be grabbed @@ -2963,8 +2950,8 @@ static int gup_fast_pmd_leaf(pmd_t orig, pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, if (pmd_special(orig)) return 0; - page = pmd_page(orig); - refs = record_subpages(page, PMD_SIZE, addr, end, pages + *nr); + refs = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT; + page = pmd_page(orig) + ((addr & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT); folio = try_grab_folio_fast(page, refs, flags); if (!folio) @@ -2985,6 +2972,8 @@ static int gup_fast_pmd_leaf(pmd_t orig, pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, } *nr += refs; + for (; refs; refs--) + *(pages++) = page++; folio_set_referenced(folio); return 1; } @@ -3003,8 +2992,8 @@ static int gup_fast_pud_leaf(pud_t orig, pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr, if (pud_special(orig)) return 0; - page = pud_page(orig); - refs = record_subpages(page, PUD_SIZE, addr, end, pages + *nr); + refs = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT; + page = pud_page(orig) + ((addr & ~PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT); folio = try_grab_folio_fast(page, refs, flags); if (!folio) @@ -3026,6 +3015,8 @@ static int gup_fast_pud_leaf(pud_t orig, pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr, } *nr += refs; + for (; refs; refs--) + *(pages++) = page++; folio_set_referenced(folio); return 1; } The nice thing is that we only record pages in the array if they actually passed our tests. -- Cheers David / dhildenb