Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] multipath-tools: clarify path selector descriptions in multipath.conf.5

Martin Wilck <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.dm-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2026-06-18 at 15:47 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 6/17/26 12:13 AM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 02:29:01PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> 
> > > +Choose the path for the next I/O request by \fBcycling through
> > > the path groups\fR.
> > 
> > This isn't a strong objections, but personally, I'm not sure
> > "groups"
> > makes this better. It kind of sounds like paths are picked from
> > multiple
> > path groups. Perhaps:
> > "cycling through the paths"
> > or
> > "cycling through the paths in the path group"
> > 
> > I'm also o.k. with leaving it as you have it.
> You are absolutely right. Using the plural "groups" breaks the
> coherence
> of the sentence because I/O is cycled within the active path group,
> not between different groups.
> 
> I'll restore the singular form in v3. Thanks

Right, my bad, sorry.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.