Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] multipath-tools: clarify path selector descriptions in multipath.conf.5
Martin Wilck <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.dm-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2026-06-18 at 15:47 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > On 6/17/26 12:13 AM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 02:29:01PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > > > > +Choose the path for the next I/O request by \fBcycling through > > > the path groups\fR. > > > > This isn't a strong objections, but personally, I'm not sure > > "groups" > > makes this better. It kind of sounds like paths are picked from > > multiple > > path groups. Perhaps: > > "cycling through the paths" > > or > > "cycling through the paths in the path group" > > > > I'm also o.k. with leaving it as you have it. > You are absolutely right. Using the plural "groups" breaks the > coherence > of the sentence because I/O is cycled within the active path group, > not between different groups. > > I'll restore the singular form in v3. Thanks Right, my bad, sorry.