Re: [PATCH] log: add l_notice

Hi Denis,

>>>>> #define L_LOG_WARNING 4
>>>>> +#define L_LOG_NOTICE 5
>>>>> #define L_LOG_INFO 6
>>>>> #define L_LOG_DEBUG 7
>>>> for what? What is the difference to just use l_info?
>>> 
>>> Per conversation on Slack, James wants to categorize certain messages for easier searching.  Since NOTICE level exists, I suggested it would fit the usecase.
>> I never really liked having many different levels. That was the reason I left l_notice out initially. I see no real benefit of it except us discussing "is this suppose to be l_info and l_notice" and in the end it will be just random.
> 
> There will always be some of that.  Each project will have to calibrate individually, but I don't see a problem exposing this inside ell.
> 
> In iwd we use l_info for purely informational messages, like hardware capabilities.  Most users won't care.  l_notice would be used for things like roaming decision logic and other messages that do not warrant a l_warn / l_error.  I think it is a nice in-between actually, particularly on non-user facing systems.

fine, then lets get a section into the coding style document.

Regards

Marcel