Re: [PATCH v31 4/7] firmware: imx: device context dedicated to priv
[email protected] Wed, 29 Jul 2026 10:03:40 +0000
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.imx,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: - [High] se_if_probe_cleanup() frees priv->priv_dev_ctx before freeing the mailbox channels, creating a race condition where the mailbox RX callback can access a freed devname string on the error logging path. -- --- Patch [4]: [PATCH v31 4/7] firmware: imx: device context dedicated to priv --- commit 29854db2c90371c5e52ff11225c81835904c4be3 Author: Pankaj Gupta <[email protected]> firmware: imx: device context dedicated to priv Add priv_dev_ctx to prepare enabling misc-device context based send-receive path, to communicate with FW. Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=4 > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.c b/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.c > --- a/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.c [ ... ] > @@ -294,13 +301,14 @@ void se_if_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *mbox_cl, void *msg) > * Clamp the copy length to the pre-allocated receiver buffer (MAX_NVM_MSG_LEN). > */ > se_clbk_hdl->rx_msg_sz = min_t(u32, rx_msg_sz, MAX_NVM_MSG_LEN); > + devname = se_clbk_hdl->dev_ctx->devname; > memcpy(se_clbk_hdl->rx_msg, msg, se_clbk_hdl->rx_msg_sz); > complete(&se_clbk_hdl->done); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&se_clbk_hdl->clbk_rx_lock, flags); > if (sz_mismatch) > dev_err(dev, > - "CMD-RCVER NVM: hdr(0x%x) with different sz(%d != %d).\n", > - *(u32 *)header, > + "%s: CMD-RCVER NVM: hdr(0x%x) with different sz(%d != %d).\n", > + devname, *(u32 *)header, > (header->size << 2), rx_msg_sz); [ ... ] > @@ -335,14 +343,15 @@ void se_if_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *mbox_cl, void *msg) > sz_mismatch = true; > > se_clbk_hdl->rx_msg_sz = min(rx_msg_sz, exp_rx_msg_sz); > + devname = se_clbk_hdl->dev_ctx->devname; > memcpy(se_clbk_hdl->rx_msg, msg, se_clbk_hdl->rx_msg_sz); > complete(&se_clbk_hdl->done); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&se_clbk_hdl->clbk_rx_lock, flags); > > if (sz_mismatch) > dev_err(dev, > - "Rsp to CMD: hdr(0x%x) with different sz(%d != %d).\n", > - *(u32 *)header, > + "%s: Rsp to CMD: hdr(0x%x) with different sz(%d != %d).\n", > + devname, *(u32 *)header, > (header->size << 2), exp_rx_msg_sz); [ ... ] > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c b/drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c > --- a/drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c [ ... ] > @@ -309,6 +339,11 @@ static void se_if_probe_cleanup(void *plat_dev) > if (!priv) > return; > > + if (priv->priv_dev_ctx) { > + kfree(priv->priv_dev_ctx->devname); > + kfree(priv->priv_dev_ctx); > + } > + > if (priv->rx_chan) > mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_chan); > if (priv->tx_chan) [Severity: High] Can this sequence result in a use-after-free of devname? If the firmware sends a response with an unexpected size during a probe transaction, sz_mismatch becomes true. In se_if_rx_callback(), the code caches devname, calls complete(), drops the lock, and then calls dev_err() passing the cached devname: drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.c:se_if_rx_callback() devname = se_clbk_hdl->dev_ctx->devname; ... complete(&se_clbk_hdl->done); spin_unlock_irqrestore(...); if (sz_mismatch) dev_err(dev, "%s ...", devname, ...); Calling complete() wakes up the waiting probe thread. If the probe aborts due to this mismatch and triggers devres cleanup, se_if_probe_cleanup() runs. Because se_if_probe_cleanup() frees priv_dev_ctx and its devname before calling mbox_free_channel() (which would otherwise synchronize and stop pending callbacks), devname could be freed while the callback thread is preempted before or during the dev_err() call. Would it be safer to free priv_dev_ctx after the mailbox channels are freed? -- Sashiko AI review ยท https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=4