Re: Reduced build and test coverage
Ricardo Cañuelo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.kernelci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Guillaume, Would it be possible to have the bisector running again? The bisector results are the main driving point when reporting regressions found by KernelCI, and without them the task of investigating regressions is rather impractical and time consuming. Even running it at a reduced capacity is much better than not having it at all. The branches we'd be interested in are (in order of importance): - mainline/master (the bare minimum) - stable-rc/queue/6.1 - stable-rc/queue/5.15 - stable-rc/queue/5.4 - stable-rc/queue/4.19 Thanks, Ricardo