Re: Reduced build and test coverage
Mark Brown <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.kernelci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 04:29:21PM +0200, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote: > Hi Guillaume, > > Would it be possible to have the bisector running again? The bisector > results are the main driving point when reporting regressions found by > KernelCI, and without them the task of investigating regressions is > rather impractical and time consuming. Even running it at a reduced > capacity is much better than not having it at all. > > The branches we'd be interested in are (in order of importance): > - mainline/master (the bare minimum) > - stable-rc/queue/6.1 > - stable-rc/queue/5.15 > - stable-rc/queue/5.4 > - stable-rc/queue/4.19 If we're doing this -next would be very helpful too.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmUJsMIACgkQJNaLcl1U h9C6dQf/aq/WlBJqVUo9kmH/AU6kCApu9jbVSFlvTIrSJsroKA8Jgh8AZX0fuk2K fWNy1SbKWlkos8OhygKrFxqV+9C28C1ubn8DS7g4DYH43mXRdVXRXvG60RL5W5pb DdGqUCkyz76Xs1JjKu+btZpoZqjlLob6QR0H3TOCRIrqmH5KwXzqGMlHeYZjPRSy vtR/ymHKVT3uef8GhhYRD+sYp+oM3ZXx80ETtnfCoBFXYG9VdvhikhDWK4rrIB5i XzsctrNeyBVerHaXi/wndAi/bdU+gXJdjxEo4g/IDWVxSr8Dk9JiNtD3Y9Yukl74 BQBWCoGfSCX/GaonJYp+4v+G/Ln0qw== =jdo/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----