Re: [PATCH v1] iio: health: max30102: fix NULL dereference in interrupt handler

On 8/1/26 9:10 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Aug 2026 10:18:42 -0500
> David Lechner <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 7/31/26 1:41 PM, Marco Chen wrote:
>>> The interrupt is requested in max30102_probe() and stays enabled  
>>
>> I've always wondered why most IIO drivers seem to do this. It seems to
>> me that requesting the irq with IRQF_NO_AUTOEN and only enabling it
>> when everything is set up for reading data would avoid spurious interrupts
>> like this.
> 
> It teaches discipline.  More serious from what I recall the no autoen thing
> used to be done via a racey bit of trying to turn it off as fast as you can.
> 
> Most of the time we should be able to write drivers that don't need to
> use that flag and don't touch enable_irq() at all.
> 
> Obviously that's not always true.
> 

Hmm... so I should go back and change [1] since it isn't strictly
required there?

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20260731-iio-adc-ti-ads112c14-continuous-mode-v2-1-eb13da38e8fc@baylibre.com/