Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic and semantic tags
Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.lkmm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:38:26PM +0100, Jonas Oberhauser wrote: > > > Am 10/30/2024 um 12:41 AM schrieb Paul E. McKenney: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 05:15:46PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:57:10PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote: > > > > Not all tags that are always there syntactically also provide semantic > > > > membership in the corresponding set. For example, an 'acquire tag on a > > > > > > Maybe: > > > > > > Not all annotated accesses provide the same semantic as their syntactic > > > tags... > > > > > > ? > > > > Jonas, are you OK with this change? If so, I can apply it on my next > > rebase. > > > > I'm ok with an extra s after semantics and a minor rephrase: > > Not all annotated accesses provide the semantics their syntactic > tags would imply > > > What do you think @Boqun ? > Yes, of course! This looks good to me. Regards, Boqun > > jonas >