Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] tools/memory-model: Switch to softcoded herd7 tags

"Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.lkmm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <55719a66-aeb9-4c20-afa6-e46dbb54c22f@paulmck-laptop>
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 10/29/2024 um 1:04 AM schrieb Boqun Feng:
> > 
> > One bit below:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:57:09PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
> > >       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >       |       RMW ops w/o return value |                                           |
> > >       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -    |                     atomic_add | R*[noreturn] ->rmw W*[once]               |
> > > +    |                     atomic_add | R*[noreturn] ->rmw W*[noreturn]           |
> > 
> > Not in this patch, but don't you need to update this again to all cap
> > to match your changes in patch #5? ;-)
> > 
> 
> Hmmm, probably that is a good idea.
> I actually had thought about it for some of the other places in the doc that
> mention the tags, and concluded that we'll just use the semantic tags there.
> 
> But in fact, this file is about the syntactic representation in herd, and
> there is no noreturn semantic tag on the W*, so it wouldn't match it even if
> it were correct.
> 
> So I think this needs to be addressed in 5/5.

Thank you for checking!

Please send me either a replacement for 5/5 or a patch for me to fold
into 5/5.

							Thanx, Paul
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.