Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] tools/memory-model: Switch to softcoded herd7 tags
"Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.lkmm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <55719a66-aeb9-4c20-afa6-e46dbb54c22f@paulmck-laptop> |
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Jonas Oberhauser wrote: > > > Am 10/29/2024 um 1:04 AM schrieb Boqun Feng: > > > > One bit below: > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:57:09PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote: > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > | RMW ops w/o return value | | > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > - | atomic_add | R*[noreturn] ->rmw W*[once] | > > > + | atomic_add | R*[noreturn] ->rmw W*[noreturn] | > > > > Not in this patch, but don't you need to update this again to all cap > > to match your changes in patch #5? ;-) > > > > Hmmm, probably that is a good idea. > I actually had thought about it for some of the other places in the doc that > mention the tags, and concluded that we'll just use the semantic tags there. > > But in fact, this file is about the syntactic representation in herd, and > there is no noreturn semantic tag on the W*, so it wouldn't match it even if > it were correct. > > So I think this needs to be addressed in 5/5. Thank you for checking! Please send me either a replacement for 5/5 or a patch for me to fold into 5/5. Thanx, Paul