Re: [PATCH RFC v8 0/8] mfd: ls2kbmc: multiple fixes for this driver
Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.mfd,org.kernel.vger.linux-gpio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMRc=McF706Vkzrvt-aTz-4gKbXj3nOi41aTqH1Sp0=Z9nVgtA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 15:20:47 +0200, Miao Wang <[email protected]> said: > Hi, > >> 2026年8月10日 21:08,Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]> 写道: >> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 3:04 PM Miao Wang via B4 Relay >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> --- >>> Changes in v8: >>> - Address issues found by the Sashiko AI review bot >>> - Fix the error path of the probe function, preventing unintentionally >>> returning 0 on failure >>> - Reorder the patches in the series to make the change to the Kconfig >>> entry for ls2kbmc to be the last patch, to satisfy the AI bot's >>> concern on failure to clean up when the driver is built as a module >>> and is being removed. >>> - Link to v7: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] >>> >> >> Don't send several versions of the same big series within minutes of >> each other. Give reviewers time to respond. > > Sorry for bothering the maintainers. A reviewer previously required > a clean or justified Sashiko pass first before reviewing and thus I > have to fix the high issues found by the bot. I would be nice if I > can privately send patches to the bot and let it review before I > send it publicly, to reduce the disturbance to other maintainers. > I tried to run that bot locally but failed because the bot was > consuming too many tokens before generating a final result. > That doesn't change anything. Sashiko commented on v7 which also contained changes requested by me. You should wait until I respond before resending the series with sashiko issues fixed because I may possibly have more comments too. Bart