Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] nvmet: pci-epf: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API
Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.mhi,dev.linux.lists.imx,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme,org.kernel.vger.dmaengine,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci |
|---|---|
| Organization | Western Digital Research |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/19/25 00:56, Frank Li wrote: > Use the new dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API to combine the > configuration and descriptor preparation into a single call. > > Since dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() performs the configuration and > preparation atomically and dw edma driver implement prep_config_sg() call > back, so dmaengine_prep_config_single() is reentriable, the mutex can be > removed. What about for platforms other than DesignWare EDMA ? This is a generic endpoint driver that can work on any platform that is endpoint capable and that has a DMA channel for the PCI endpoint. The dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API should be handling everything transparently for any platform, regardless of the DMA channel driver implementing or not the prep_config_sg() callback. For platforms that do not implement it, I suspect that the mutex will still be needed here. So how to we resolve this ? Ideally, all of that should be hidden by the DMA API. The endpoint driver should not need to deal with these differences. > > Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c | 18 ++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c > index 56b1c6a7706a9e2dd9d8aaf17b440129b948486c..8b5ea5d4c79dfd461b767cfd4033a9e4604c94b1 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c > +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c > @@ -388,22 +388,15 @@ static int nvmet_pci_epf_dma_transfer(struct nvmet_pci_epf *nvme_epf, > return -EINVAL; > } > > - mutex_lock(lock); > - > dma_dev = dmaengine_get_dma_device(chan); > dma_addr = dma_map_single(dma_dev, seg->buf, seg->length, dir); > ret = dma_mapping_error(dma_dev, dma_addr); > if (ret) > - goto unlock; > - > - ret = dmaengine_slave_config(chan, &sconf); > - if (ret) { > - dev_err(dev, "Failed to configure DMA channel\n"); > - goto unmap; > - } > + return ret; > > - desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(chan, dma_addr, seg->length, > - sconf.direction, DMA_CTRL_ACK); > + desc = dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe(chan, dma_addr, seg->length, > + sconf.direction, > + DMA_CTRL_ACK, &sconf); > if (!desc) { > dev_err(dev, "Failed to prepare DMA\n"); > ret = -EIO; > @@ -426,9 +419,6 @@ static int nvmet_pci_epf_dma_transfer(struct nvmet_pci_epf *nvme_epf, > unmap: > dma_unmap_single(dma_dev, dma_addr, seg->length, dir); > > -unlock: > - mutex_unlock(lock); > - > return ret; > } > > -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research