Re: [PATCH v9 00/10] Fix missing fops.owner in Rust DRM/misc abstractions

On Fri Jul 31, 2026 at 5:34 PM BST, Alvin Sun wrote:
> Hi Miguel,
>
> Thanks for taking a look!
>
> On 7/31/26 14:46, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 4:11=E2=80=AFAM Alvin Sun <[email protected]> =
wrote:
>>> base-commit: b7e5ac83cb16f7ffd11dc23736f84276602100ed
>> Was this old tag used for some reason?
>
> That was an oversight on my part - I forgot to rebase onto the latest
> tag before sending v9. The series is now based on v7.2-rc4.
>
>>
>>> prerequisite-change-id: 20260519-miscdev-use-format-9ab7e83b1c11:v3
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 405b334ff0d48ad350014f05a2321bdbaa025400
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 604b631c81d5423f4ebb2e12ba2d22e9ce371bfc
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: cb550d94cefe01920e0d3ced2b2bcbecd76f3907
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 3bc830839742591460cb86d9472c04f4686dc600
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 571058244bc8c7088638d2e3225713011246c7e9
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 347c5a3c6dbef9832bfce8419fc23e6e08ba477f
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 3e202d988b56b88446f7535e90d3f00cf5f15701
>> Are all these actually needed? Some seem unrelated (some were already
>> applied too).
>
> The prerequisites were just some import formatting changes that the
> series depended on at the time. After rebasing onto v7.2-rc4, I was
> able to drop all of them - the rebase was clean with no conflicts.
>
> I'll send v10 shortly.

If the patch applies cleanly then there's a no need to send a new version.

Best,
Gary

>
> Best regards,
> Alvin
>
>> The only one that seems needed has Andreas' Acked-by, so
>> I guess it is fine.
>>
>> (By the way, I will use this second message to take this chance to
>> move the modules maintainers in the To: in case it helps, since I
>> didn't do it in my previous message)
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Miguel