Re: [PATCH v9 00/10] Fix missing fops.owner in Rust DRM/misc abstractions

On 8/1/26 00:43, Gary Guo wrote:
> On Fri Jul 31, 2026 at 5:34 PM BST, Alvin Sun wrote:
>> Hi Miguel,
>>
>> Thanks for taking a look!
>>
>> On 7/31/26 14:46, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 4:11 AM Alvin Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> base-commit: b7e5ac83cb16f7ffd11dc23736f84276602100ed
>>> Was this old tag used for some reason?
>> That was an oversight on my part - I forgot to rebase onto the latest
>> tag before sending v9. The series is now based on v7.2-rc4.
>>
>>>> prerequisite-change-id: 20260519-miscdev-use-format-9ab7e83b1c11:v3
>>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 405b334ff0d48ad350014f05a2321bdbaa025400
>>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 604b631c81d5423f4ebb2e12ba2d22e9ce371bfc
>>>> prerequisite-patch-id: cb550d94cefe01920e0d3ced2b2bcbecd76f3907
>>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 3bc830839742591460cb86d9472c04f4686dc600
>>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 571058244bc8c7088638d2e3225713011246c7e9
>>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 347c5a3c6dbef9832bfce8419fc23e6e08ba477f
>>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 3e202d988b56b88446f7535e90d3f00cf5f15701
>>> Are all these actually needed? Some seem unrelated (some were already
>>> applied too).
>> The prerequisites were just some import formatting changes that the
>> series depended on at the time. After rebasing onto v7.2-rc4, I was
>> able to drop all of them - the rebase was clean with no conflicts.
>>
>> I'll send v10 shortly.
> If the patch applies cleanly then there's a no need to send a new version.

Sounds good. I'll hold off on v10 then. Thanks!

Best regards,
Alvin

>
> Best,
> Gary
>
>> Best regards,
>> Alvin
>>
>>> The only one that seems needed has Andreas' Acked-by, so
>>> I guess it is fine.
>>>
>>> (By the way, I will use this second message to take this chance to
>>> move the modules maintainers in the To: in case it helps, since I
>>> didn't do it in my previous message)
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Miguel
>